Darkest Hour

Or Dunkirk Part II

I’m still resisting the idea movie reviews will ever be a regular feature of this site, but after watching this December’s Darkest Hour I did feel something needed to be said.  Especially since I commented on Dunkirk this last summer.

This movie is focused almost entirely on Winston Churchill’s first month as Prime Minister, which means it mostly covers the same ground as Dunkirk.  Obviously the focus is very different, apart from a few very brief cut-scenes there are no actual combat sequences this time. Given what a nit-picker I am about hardware issues that may be a good thing…   although I should mention when Churchill flies to meet meet French leadership immediately after taking office he is shown in a Dakota; without checking references I’ll say I think it should have been a Dragon Rapide or something else older, smaller, more British.  Talk about nit-picking!

But this is really a character driven drama.  Even more than Dunkirk a better parallel might be The King’s Speech.  The portrayals here are fascinating and very well done.  This Churchill (Gary Oldman, almost unrecognizable in significant make-up) is easy to like and admire. The other main movers and shakers here are Chamberlin (Ronald Pickup)  and Halifax (Stephen Dillane), who also get somewhat sympathetic treatment.  The natural wisdom being war is bad, makes it easy to relate to those who push for peace at any price. Chamberlin in particular seems clear eyed about what he wants for posterity.  Other things I’ve read are much less sympathetic towards Halifax who continues to push for peace even if it means a humiliating armistice.  Most writers seem to sum him up as pro-German; the more layered presentation here shows the appeal of his position, even if he is flat wrong in dealing with Nazis.  And that leads to the climax as Churchill has doubts if he can resist if he looses his entire army.

Another significant character in the story is King George VI (Ben Mendelsohn) whose relationship with Churchill starts strained, and quite amusing, but grows and changes more than any other in the film.
There are also two critically important female characters.  Churchill’s wife Clementine (Kristin Scott Thomas) brings out the great man’s more human side and is the sort of completely awesome partner anyone could hope for.  The most humble and “ordinary” character in the story is Elizabeth Layton (Lily James), Churchill’s personal secretary who is new to the job at the start which means a lot of learning and narration we as the audience get in the story are channeled through her.  Although I believe the real Elizabeth Layton actually started after the events of this movie, and was an older more experienced secretary/steno than this implies.  Still, it was good device and source of entertainment throughout.

Overall this was an excellent film. I felt much less burned by technical gripes than I was in Dunkirk and would actually rate this somewhat higher partly as a result of that.  But even more because I loved the focus on characters and personalities.  Normally Dave’s rating scale involves numbers of explosions, but this is proof its possible to make a good movie based on characters and story.  Now hopefully it won’t win any awards or I may have to take all of that back!

~Dave 

Advertisements

About atcDave

I'm 54 years old and live in Ypsilanti, Michigan. I'm happily married to Jodie. I've been an air traffic controller for 31 years; grew up in the Chicago area, and am still a fanatic for pizza and the Chicago Bears. My main interest is military history, and my related hobbies include scale model building and strategy games.
This entry was posted in Miscellaneous and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Darkest Hour

  1. Thanks for a great review Dave. I was in two minds wether I should see the movie, but now I will. Like you, I scrutinize war movies for their technical errors. I tend to be a little unforgiving when it comes to uniforms, military vehicles, aircraft and even whether service personnel are saluting correctly! I really should just learn to suspend disbelief and enjoy the movie! I hope you and your family had a great Christmas and I wish you a happy New year.

    • atcDave says:

      Yeah I feel your pain! It’s often so frustrating when they can’t just get it RIGHT. At least this movie has fewer military trappings, and I’m not that up on clothing styles of the 1940s.

      And thanks Rich, we had a good and very cold Christmas!

  2. jfwknifton says:

    I think I shall give this film a go as Churchill is my hero. You are right to nit pick about lazy television. How often here in England we watch documentaries where Spanish Heinkel IIIs bomb Dover in 1940 or better still, huge forces of Douglas Dauntlesses set off to attack Pearl Harbor.

    • atcDave says:

      Oh yeah, the Japanese Dauntlesses are a classic. I think that footage is originally from a wartime documentary about the attack on Pearl Harbor, and it’s been recycled a million times since!

  3. Neil Page says:

    looks like Churchill did most of his shuttling around in May 1940 in a De Havilland DH 95 Flamingo, bit bigger than a Rapide!
    http://www.finesthourwarbirds.co.uk/blog/battle-of-france/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s